← Operations Journal

Inventory & control

Before you adjust an inventory variance, check the story behind it.

A difference between the shelf and the system is a starting point for review. Use a short investigation to understand what the count actually represents.

DNAction · November 10, 2026 · 5 min read

The count says 84. The system says 96. Someone needs to decide what happens next.

Our starting point would be to preserve both numbers and investigate the difference. A count records an observation at a particular place and time. To compare it with a system balance, the team needs to know whether both numbers refer to the same item, unit, location, and moment in the workflow.

Establish what was counted

Ask the counter to identify the item, location, and unit used. If a part is stocked in eaches but purchased in boxes, a quantity without its unit can leave the reviewer guessing. Packaging labels and partial containers deserve a closer look.

Consider this fictional example. A location holds seven full boxes, with twelve pieces in each box. Seven boxes and 84 pieces describe the same quantity. A system balance of 96 pieces would then leave a difference of twelve pieces to investigate. Recording “7” without the unit would create a different problem.

Compare the count with the relevant movements

Choose a clear reference point for the system balance and record the count time. Then examine the receiving, issuing, picking, or transfer activity that could explain the difference. Work completed physically and recorded later can complicate the comparison.

A short review record can keep the investigation focused.

A fictional variance review
CheckEvidence to retain
Identity and locationItem ID, bin, label, and any similar stock nearby
Unit and quantitySeven boxes × twelve pieces = 84 pieces
TimingCount time, reference balance, and relevant movements
DecisionRecount, investigate further, or submit for authorized adjustment

Give the next action an owner

A recount should answer a specific question. It might confirm a partial box, verify the item in the bin, or check whether the count included stock waiting to move. Give someone responsibility for resolving that question and recording the result.

If an adjustment is appropriate, follow the approval process in your inventory system. Keep the observation, explanation, and authorization together so the team can understand the decision later.

Look for the repeatable cause

Once the individual difference is resolved, ask whether it points to a recurring issue. Similar labels, unclear locations, pack conversions, and delayed transaction entry are all useful questions for a process review. Use the evidence you retained to choose the next investigation.

Try this at your next count.

Choose one variance and write down the item, location, unit, count time, relevant movement, and reviewer’s decision. See which of those facts your current process makes difficult to recover.

That exercise provides a concrete starting point for improving the counting workflow. It can also help define what a counting tool needs to capture before your team evaluates one.

LET’S MAKE WORK FLOW

One problem.
A better way forward.

Tell us what’s getting in the way ↗